Authorship in Helen Garner's The First Stone
Helen Garner may be the most interesting character that's revealed in The Initial Stone due to her language tactics and her unique method of writing. It is a non-fiction text message, extremely personal, (as we just hear Garners point of view) genuine and frank. The novel was incredibly controversial, particularly as Garner is definitely a pioneering feminist, and her method of writing the reserve goes against all suggestions and beliefs of feminism and being truly a feminist. The interesting point about Garners writing technique is certainly that she poses dilemmas and raises considerably more questions than answers, so she continues us guessing before end of the reserve. Helen Garner may be the most interesting identity revealed in The Primary Stone, because since she actually is telling us the report of the Ormond sexual harassment case, we figure out how to value her thoughts and opinions, which may be the only one we hear through the entire novel. However, this content of The First Stone thrust Garner into an inescapable spotlight, and was a significant controversy and she quickly had many persons (mainly feminists) opposing her strategies that she wrote down in her publication.
The First Natural stone is a book about two young ladies going to Ormond University in Melbourne who were at a celebration and claimed to have already been sexually assaulted by the Expert of their University at that time, Dr Colin Shepherd. Garner became significantly intrigued by the circumstance, and as the history unfolds, the reader views what Garner thinks of both women, feminism, men, (encompassing sex and electricity) and even, what happened on the night time of the get together. She begins investigating and searching for interviews almost immediately, even attending the ultimate court hearing. She speaks to many persons surrounding